
.webp)
Dr Norman Marcus
For decades, chronic pain has been framed as a puzzle rooted primarily in bones, nerves, and structural abnormalities. X-rays and MRIs have long been considered the gold standard in diagnosis, and patients presenting with back, neck, or shoulder pain are routinely guided into pathways built on these assumptions: injections, nerve blocks, and, in many cases, spinal surgery.
Yet emerging science tells a different story - one that challenges long-held beliefs about where chronic pain truly begins.
Recent research across multiple disciplines has revealed that muscle and soft-tissue dysfunction may be among the most overlooked contributors to chronic pain worldwide. Despite making up nearly 45 percent of the human body, muscles are rarely the focus of diagnostic evaluation. They are seldom palpated thoroughly, rarely imaged meaningfully, and almost never considered a primary source of persistent pain, even when symptoms strongly suggest muscular involvement.
The consequences of this oversight are not minor. Tens of millions of Americans experience chronic pain each year; as many as 64 million adults reported chronic pain in 2023 alone. A significant - but largely unmeasured - portion of that burden may be attributable to muscular causes. One reason the number is elusive is that current clinical guidelines do not require assessing muscles at all.
But newer studies are beginning to challenge that paradigm. Research published in recent years has shown that myofascial trigger points - hyperirritable areas within muscle fibers - can refer pain to other body parts including muscles and joints, mimicking conditions like neuropathy, joint disease, and spinal disorders. In one pilot study, patients scheduled for spine surgery were evaluated with detailed muscle examinations. A surprising portion - nearly two-thirds - were found to have pain that originated in muscular tissue rather than the spine. When their muscle pain was treated appropriately, most no longer required surgery.
This raises a profound question: How many invasive procedures could be avoided if clinicians were trained to examine muscle tissue first?
Part of the challenge lies in the tools and training available. Traditional imaging does not reveal muscle dysfunction. Standard medical education devotes minimal time to muscle pain, focusing instead on nerve, skeletal, and inflammatory conditions. The lack of a clear muscle-diagnostic framework has led clinicians to interpret pain primarily through the lens of the systems they know best.
Yet researchers are now exploring technologies that can identify dysfunctional muscle tissue with greater accuracy. Electrical stimulation devices, for example, have shown promise in pinpointing hypersensitive muscle fibers that produce pain signals disproportionate to the degree of mechanical stimulation - one of the hallmarks of chronic myofascial pain (pain that originates in muscle and fascia). Complementary studies in molecular biology are examining biochemical markers of muscle injury, inflammation, and sensitization, offering new pathways for early detection and targeted treatment.
What is emerging is a deeper, more nuanced understanding of chronic pain - not as a monolithic condition, but as a complex interplay between muscles, nerves, fascia, emotion, and behavior. The biopsychosocial model, once viewed as the domain of psychiatry, is increasingly recognized as essential in interpreting how pain is experienced. Research now shows that muscle tension, posture, stress, and movement patterns can all contribute to persistent pain syndromes, and that altering these factors can produce meaningful relief.
Yet despite this growing body of evidence, the healthcare system remains structurally unprepared to integrate muscle pain into standard care. Insurance coverage for muscle-based assessments is inconsistent. Many clinicians have never received formal training in palpation of myofascial tissue. And public awareness of muscular pain as a diagnosable, treatable condition remains limited.
The result is a cycle that perpetuates unnecessary suffering: patients undergo extensive imaging, receive inconclusive results, attempt multiple therapies, and, when frustration peaks, are offered invasive interventions that often fail to address the underlying source of pain.
Breaking that cycle requires reframing chronic pain around the science emerging today. It requires research institutions committed to studying muscle function. It demands advocacy to ensure muscular pain is included in medical guidelines. And it calls for educational reform so clinicians can confidently diagnose and treat muscular disorders.
The hidden science of muscle pain is no longer hidden. The evidence is here.
What remains is the will to act on it, and the collective commitment to end unnecessary suffering for millions living with pain that could finally be understood.
